Apple A12 Bionic vs Apple A14 Bionic Benchmark, comparison and differences
Nội Dung Chính
CPU comparison with benchmarks
Apple A12 Bionic
Apple A14 Bionic
CPU comparison
Apple A12 Bionic or Apple A14 Bionic – which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Apple A12 Bionic has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.49 GHz. Up to 4 GB of memory is supported in 1 memory channels. The Apple A12 Bionic was released in Q3/2018.
The Apple A14 Bionic has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Apple A14 Bionic was released in Q3/2020.
Apple A series
Family
Apple A series
Apple A12/A12X/A12Z
CPU group
Apple A14
12
Generation
14
A12
Architecture
A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm)
Mobile
Segment
Mobile
Apple A11 Bionic
Predecessor
Apple A13 Bionic
Apple A13 Bionic
Successor
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The Apple A12 Bionic has 6 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Apple A12 Bionic is 2.49
GHz
while the Apple A14 Bionic has 6 CPU cores and 6 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Apple A14 Bionic is at 1.59
GHz
.
6
Cores
6
6
Threads
6
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Core architecture
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No
Hyperthreading
No
No
Overclocking ?
No
2.49
GHz
2x Vortex
A-Core
3.00
GHz
2x Firestorm
1.59
GHz
4x Tempest
B-Core
1.82
GHz
4x Icestorm
—
C-Core
—
Internal Graphics
The Apple A12 Bionic or Apple A14 Bionic has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system’s main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor’s die.
Apple A12
GPU
Apple A14
1.13
GHz
GPU frequency
1.00
GHz
GPU (Turbo)
9
GPU Generation
11
7 nm
Technology
5 nm
1
Max. displays
3
32
Execution units
64
256
Shader
512
4
GB
Max. GPU Memory
8
GB
DirectX Version
Hardware codec support
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
Decode / Encode
Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Codec h264
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Codec VP9
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Codec VP8
Decode / Encode
No
Codec AV1
No
Decode
Codec AVC
Decode
Decode
Codec VC-1
Decode
Decode / Encode
Codec JPEG
Decode / Encode
Memory & PCIe
The Apple A12 Bionic can use up to 4 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 34.1
GB/s
. The Apple A14 Bionic supports up to 6 GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 34.1
GB/s
.
LPDDR4X-4266
Memory
LPDDR4X-4266
4
GB
Max. Memory
6
GB
1
(Single Channel)
Memory channels
1
(Single Channel)
34.1
GB/s
Bandwidth
34.1
GB/s
No
ECC
No
8.00
MB
L2 Cache
12.00
MB
L3 Cache
16.00
MB
—
PCIe version
—
PCIe lanes
Thermal Management
The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Apple A12 Bionic is 6
W
, while the Apple A14 Bionic has a TDP of 7
W
. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.
6
W
TDP (
PL1
/
PBP
)
7
W
—
TDP (
PL2
)
—
—
TDP up
—
—
TDP down
—
—
Tjunction max.
—
Technical details
The Apple A12 Bionic is manufactured in 7 nm and has 8.00 MB cache. The Apple A14 Bionic is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 8.00 MB cache.
7
nm
Technology
5
nm
Chiplet
Chip design
Chiplet
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Instruction set (ISA)
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions
—
Socket
—
None
Virtualization
None
No
AES-NI
No
iOS
Operating systems
iOS
Q3/2018
Release date
Q3/2020
—
Release price
—
show more data
show more data
6C 6T @ 2.49
GHz
buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 6T @ 3.00
GHz
buy now on Amazon and save!
VS Description of the processor
In the CPU comparison of the Apple A12 Bionic against the Apple A14 Bionic you can see how Apple could significantly increase the performance of generation to generation. This concerns the CPU as well as the GPU part of the APUS. Apple benefits from modern production in addition to the IPC improvement of each generation. The Apple is always one of the first manufacturers who use new manufacturing technologies.
Thus, the Apple A14 BIONIC as one of the first processors is manufactured at all in the 5 nm manufacturing process at TSMC. The finer structures allow higher clock frequencies with lower heat development. Of this, the processors benefit primarily for multi-core scenarios where older processors quickly have to throttle their clock frequency to overheat.
Both mobile processors are optimized for smartphones and tablets and have a hybrid core architecture (Big.Little). In this case, strong high performance cores are combined with weaker and economical energy-saving cores. Depending on the utilization of the processor, it can distribute the requests to the optimal CPU cores. This not only saves energy but can also increase performance when all cores work together on one or more queries.
Through the finer structures, the Apple A14 Bionic now has a base frequency of 1.8 GHz, during the
Apple A12 Bionic His cores with 1.59 GHz clocks. The performance cores of the A14 can achieve clock frequencies in turbo mode for the first time of just over 3 GHz, which is currently the top spot for a smartphone processor.
In the IGPU of Apple A14 Bionic, the support of video codecs has improved in addition to the blueprint. This is how the free and new AV1 videoCODEC is supported (decoding in hardware). Both processors probably have a TDP of 6 watts and support up to 16 GB of RAM (LPDDR4X-4266 at the A12 or LPDDR5-5500 at the A14).
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index 
In the CPU comparison of the Apple A12 Bionic against the Apple A14 Bionic you can see how Apple could significantly increase the performance of generation to generation. This concerns the CPU as well as the GPU part of the APUS. Apple benefits from modern production in addition to the IPC improvement of each generation. The Apple is always one of the first manufacturers who use new manufacturing technologies.Thus, the Apple A14 BIONIC as one of the first processors is manufactured at all in the 5 nm manufacturing process at TSMC. The finer structures allow higher clock frequencies with lower heat development. Of this, the processors benefit primarily for multi-core scenarios where older processors quickly have to throttle their clock frequency to overheat.Both mobile processors are optimized for smartphones and tablets and have a hybrid core architecture (Big.Little). In this case, strong high performance cores are combined with weaker and economical energy-saving cores. Depending on the utilization of the processor, it can distribute the requests to the optimal CPU cores. This not only saves energy but can also increase performance when all cores work together on one or more queries.Through the finer structures, the Apple A14 Bionic now has a base frequency of 1.8 GHz, during theApple A12 Bionic His cores with 1.59 GHz clocks. The performance cores of the A14 can achieve clock frequencies in turbo mode for the first time of just over 3 GHz, which is currently the top spot for a smartphone processor.In the IGPU of Apple A14 Bionic, the support of video codecs has improved in addition to the blueprint. This is how the free and new AV1 videoCODEC is supported (decoding in hardware). Both processors probably have a TDP of 6 watts and support up to 16 GB of RAM (LPDDR4X-4266 at the A12 or LPDDR5-5500 at the A14).In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
